fbpx
Connect with us

Africa

Zondo Under the Spotlight – As Sanangura names Willis J, a Corrupt Judge

Peter Smith

Published

on

In a letter dated 28 January 2022 addressed to the Acting Judge President Zondo, who challenged Hon. Sisulu, to have a fact-based discourse rather than engage in abstractions, Dr. Cleopus Sanangura, fingered the former Justice as corrupt.

Dr. Sanangura speaks from personal experiences and his 23-page open letter to Honourable Mr. Justice Zondo singles out Willis J (https://businesstech.co.za/news/trending/30925/legal-trouble-for-social-media-comments-in-sa/) as a person who was not fit and proper to serve justice.

He accuses Willis J of constructively, knowingly, and intentionally changing his evidence with his own creation to legitimize the granting of a judgment in favor of the government of Zimbabwe (GOZ) tainted by fraud.

He said: “I thought that apartheid had ended in 1994 as the official ideology but Willis J convinced me otherwise.

He used the court to exempt a purported Plaintiff from suffering the burden of proving his claim and manipulated in broad daylight my evidence to legitimize fraud inside a courtroom and not outside its circumference.

During the trial, my evidence was not contested, and yet crooked Willis J miraculously using his judicial power and discretion, proceeded to import facts that were never adduced in court and used his own evidence to deliver a monetary judgment.

I reported the matter to the Sandton Police Station under Case Number 74-01-15 at the Sandton Police Station and a similar case was also opened against Willis J and the attorneys who prosecuted this fraud including the Administrator who was extrajudicially appointed in Zimbabwe and without being recognized in SA as a representative of a juristic entity whose control and management was alienated from its shareholders and directors in an unprecedented and grotesque manner, but the officer assigned to investigate this criminal matter, Captain Mabaso, refused and failed to investigate the complaint arguing that the SAPS lacked title to investigate this crime against the courts and South Africa.

With respect to this matter, it is astonishing that President Ramaphosa through the affidavit he personally authorized but did not depose to it himself apart from filing an affidavit yesterday, purporting to authorize the Acting Head of Legal and Executive Services in his department to associate himself with the fraud in the judgment as follows:

I was the Chief Financial Officer of SAS and my evidence was that no diversion of funds took place.

One would have expected President Ramaphosa to investigate the alleged fraud in the judgment before using the judicial system to perpetrate fraud and in so doing shield corrupt judges from being subjected to any scrutiny.

I attach below President Ramaphosa’s belated supporting affidavit where he argues that he has title to outsource the deposition of facts in his possession to a third party and that this conduct is permissible in terms of the court rules:

This position that the President can substitute the Court in determining whether he can respond to an application through a proxy is unprecedented.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Warning: Undefined variable $user_ID in /home/iniafrica/public_html/wp-content/themes/zox-news/comments.php on line 49

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply