Connect with us


The intersection between Justice and Gender-Based Violence and Fermicide



Question 1

Does a causal link exist between a broken and an unaccountable justice delivery system and GBVF? If so, in what way?

Key words

Broken justice system (BJS)
Unaccountable justice system (UJS)
Gender Based Violence and Femicide (GBVF)
Causal link (CL)
Author: Tichaona Mupasiri ([email protected] )

Auditing, assessment and evaluation of systems is a necessary “evil” if accountability is to be called for; and justice systems world over are not an exception as they fall within the ambit of public office which must be viewed in its entirety as public property whose escapability to public scrutiny should be next to zero. In this contemporary time and age, it is worthwhile to interrogate the nexus between a broken and an unaccountable justice system and the topical matter of Gender Based Violence and Femicide which has caused extremes headaches even for most powerful world governments. It is imperative that for shared understanding to exist, certain key terms such as broken justice system, Unaccountable justice system, Gender Based Violence and Femicide and Causal Link should be defined. The definitions given are based on my lived experiences as a serial litigant.

A broken justice system is a justice system which has gaps, voids, fissures and holes that militates the attainment of the promises of justice; that is fairness and equality. It is tantamount to a broken live wire which cannot live up to its promise of delivering current which is need to light up gadgets which depend on it.

An unaccountable justice system is that justice systems which is not answerable for its generally wrongful actions and in most cases in its service to the public, does not only take stinging yet valid questions lightly but also shies away from the truth and or give its own version of truth regarding a matter thrown in its arena for determination. An unaccountable justice system operates with impunity and is evasive.

Gender Based Violence and Femicide (GBVF) is any form of violence influenced and motivated by a conquering spirit over feminineness of another sovereign being to the extent of in extreme cases exterminate the perceived weak being. This takes various forms from rape, emotional, psychological violence and even inequalities in workplaces in relation to even salaries, job titles and responsibilities.

A causal link is the catalytic element that motivates a result. It is a bridge, nexus and gateway to an end. It is that which causes an outcome.

A broken justice systems is corrupt and defeats the ends of justice at all costs. A broken justice is corruptible and therefore whoever can oil it in terms of bribes can obtain a favourable judgment and proper, fair, reasonable and prompt justice delivery becomes a victim. A broken justice systems is always at war with rule of law and does not respect property rights. Absence of rule of law translates to poverty and poverty is a fertile ground for GBVF. Where there is poverty it is only the fittest who survive and the feminine find themselves at the receiving end due to the social construction which conditioned them to believe so.

Because women have been taught from childhood that men are born powerful and conquerors, the dare not report any form of abuse because they are aware that in a broken system, nothing meaningful and in the interests of justice is sired.

Under this circumstance, both the masculine and the feminine must be provoked to be angry through literature, seminars and accounts which promote active citizenship; and most importantly should be assisted from young age to cultivate a culture of speaking out. For example, a broken justice system in Zimbabwe caused the placement of SMM Holdings (Private) Limited, a company registered and operating under the laws of Zimbabwe, under reconstruction, depriving shareholders and directors of its control. This must not be underestimated as it led to loss of livelihood for more than 20000 families in a small mining town of Mashava in Zimbabwe. It must be noted that women who made up a greater number of housewives were traumatized as this new unpleasant reality of job losses by their husbands at the instigation of the Zimbabwe justice system dawned on them. At the instigation of the government of Zimbabwe, using the broken justice systems in South Africa, jobs were lost at South African companies such as Aldolex, Southern Asbestos Sales and Petter Trading to mention but a few. In Zambia the same happened to TAP Building products where similarly the high court of Zambia recognised a foreign law which was inimical to the rule of law.

Families of the bread winners were at the receiving with no care from the broken justice systems. It is therefore clear that there exists a umbilical cord that joins a broken justice system with GBVF.

Shifting to unaccountable justice systems, there are many points to note. An unaccountable justice systems keeps and aids the brokenness of a justice system. It is a conduit on which criminality is executed with no shame. An unaccountable justice system owes not duty to the constitution but to itself. This is a system which thrives on self-help schemes and has a complex structure in which those who are supposed to uphold defend, respect and obey the constitution are the ones who disrespect it.

This show of an unaccountable justice system is seen in big law firms like ENSAfrica which to date is opposing the version that the company SMM placed under reconstruction is not a company but an organ of the state. The failure by ENSAfrica to accept accountability and wrong doing in the prosecution of SMM matters in South Africa is salt in the wounds of many families which suffered as a result of the matter which were fraudulently brought before the South African courts. Up to now both the South African and Zimbabwean courts have refused to take accountability to the pain and suffering caused to many women and children who looked up to the company to meet their economic needs.

In another matter in Zimbabwe, sometime in 1997, a Zimbabwean, Mr Walter Nhliziyo, who left Zimbabwe for The United Kingdom had his house unlawfully taken and sold by the bank despite him settling what was due. This caused irreparable pain to his family; wife and children that to date they are still to recover from this nightmare. The causal link between an unaccountable justice delivery system and GBVF should not be downplayed.

A just and accountable justice delivery system ushers in a promise of a safe and secure future for all and it is important that each person works towards being the change that he/she ought to see and enjoy.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


When President Mnangagwa signed a document purporting to be his mate, see the reality?



Continue Reading


Hopewell Chin’ono’s Hypocrisy Exposed by Mr. Tinashe Mpasiri



On 24 November 2022, Mr. Hopewell Chin’ono shared this tweet on his wall: https://twitter.com/daddyhope/status/1595758807392534528?s=20&t=YflO7bnB-32EN89x_0fPfQ with the following message directed to nameless and faceless South Africans:

“What we ask from South African citizens is for your President to STOP sanitizing Corrupt Rule in Zimbabwe and to STOP lying that our economy was destroyed by sanctions Listen to our President speak about the LOOTING in 1996.

Why doesn’t your president speak about free elections?”

The above mentioned tweet led to a conversation between Mr. Mpasiri, a member of the Justice Under Rule of Law (JUROL) and Mr. Chin’ono as set out on this link: https://heyzine.com/flip-book/d47b109920.html.

When asked why he had chosen to share a video of 1996 in support of his narrative that President Ramaphosa was guilty of sanitizing the corrupt practices by President Mnangagwa and his administration, Mr. Chin’ono responded as follows:

“ZPF leading Public officials operate with criminal business partners to loot public resources. For all intents and purposes sanctions are not the cause of Zim economic quagmire but ZPF looting public purse thru its puppet business partners from as far back as 1996?”

Advocate Matiza, a member of the Justice Under Rule of Law made the following observations and also a participant in the Banking on Africa’s Future (BOAF) – Legal Literacy WhatsApp group, commended as follows: “It is clear from the above that by importing the video in which Mr. Mawere was featured with Minister Mnangagwa as he was known then, Mr. Chin’ono was openly alleging that Mr. Mawere was Mnangagwa’s then criminal business partner who was his accomplice in looting public resources of Zimbabwe.

However, when exposed by Mr. Mpasiri, a member of JUROL and BOAF, Mr. Chin’ono backtracked as set out below:

TM: Good morning Mr Chin’ono.
My name is Tinashe Mpasiri and I am a member of the Justice Under Rule Of Law (JUROL).
I am an avid follower of your posts and exposé and certainly wish that there were more
Zimbabweans like you, working towards a diverse, inclusive, progressive and prosperous future
for all.
I just wanted to greet you and share with you a post that was shared in a group I am a part of,
that you may be able to shed more light on it.
HC: Thank you. I did an interview last night on the issue. Feel free to share it in your group
Find it here;
TM: Thank you very much sir.
Just for your information, I belong to a group with officials from Wits University and questions
arose yesterday after your sharing of the video.
I have been asked to communicate with you so I get clarity, so we can share with a proper
Your narrative on the tweet is about president Ramaphosa’s failure to act on corruption in
Zimbabwe, but the content of the video, appears nothing to do with the corruption angle.
Kindly assist with the link between the two.
HC: Good morning. Thank you for the question and you can share this audio in your group, you have my permission.
President Ramophosa has been at the forefront of saying incorrectly that the economic crisis in Zimbabwe has been caused by sanctions, which is not true.
The video that you are referencing, is meant to show that the economic crisis in Zimbabwe
started way before sanctions were imposed by western countries.
The economic crisis was authored by looting of public funds by ZANU PF elites and their business surrogates and the plunder of the country’s natural resources.
That video shows president Mnangagwa when he was Finance Minister in 1996, speaking at an event in Washington explaining how public funds have been looted.
So my point is that the president of South Africa, Cyril Ramaphosa shouldn’t be going around
misleading unsuspecting audiences, by saying that the economic crisis in Zimbabwe is being
caused by sanctions.
So for instance, president Ramaphosa talks about the social services pressures that are exerted by Zimbabweans coming into South Africa to use things like public services like health care. And all hospitals in Zimbabwe, all central hospitals in Zimbabwe, five of them, they only require 50 million to run without any shortages and that will make sure that Zimbabweans don’t have to cross the border into South Africa to seek public services that are provided through hospitals but these hospitals in Zimbabwe don’t have paracetamol.
The biggest hospital in Zimbabwe, Sally Mugabe hospital does not even have paracetamol, it
doesn’t have basic things like bandages and 50 million is only, that’s all we need to run our
central hospitals, but it’s not being availed to these central hospitals.
Now, ZANU PF by its own admission, says that 150 million USD worth of gold is being smuggled by ZANU PF elites and their surrogates every month. Which means what they steal in one month can run our central hospitals for 3 years.
That is the point that I making that president Ramaphosa is misleading unsuspecting audiences by saying that the crisis in Zimbabwe which is over spilling into South Africa, is being caused by sanctions, it’s not true it’s caused by sanctions. It’s caused by mis-governance. Thank you.
TM: Thank you very much Mr. Chin’ono.
This is very helpful and I believe we can build a shared understanding of only when we engage.
I will share your insights in my circles and beyond.
A number of questions emerge from your audio. By surrogates and having had the benefit to watch the video, who would be the surrogates and especially having regard to the fact that Minister Mnangagwa (as he were then), was speaking to a different subject matter involving empowerment and the role of government in financing it.
I could be wrong, but it is self-evident that he was talking about government programs whose
execution resulted in financial support being diverted to personal use.
Your response to the above would greatly assist.
HC: Surrogates were people like Mutumwa Mawere who was his front until they fell out.
Today surrogates refers to people like Kuda Tagwirei who has been a front for State looting
using his myriad of companies.

Here Mr. Chin’ono identifies Mr. Mawere as Mnangagwa’s front until they allegedly fell out.

This narrative is similar to the one peddled by Chin’ono’s friend and President Mnangagwa’s confidante and lawyer, Mr. Edwin Manikai as follows:

The message above was authored by Mr. Manikai on 27 March 2021 and was addressed to Mr. Fred Mutanda. The version peddled by Mr. Chin’ono is the same as Manikai’s version.
Mr. Manikai in the middle with Mr. Hopewell Chin’ono
Mr. Manikai in the picture with the visiting American delegation of Senators to Zimbabwe and his wife and Hon. Mliswa, Manikai’s best friend.
The SMM heist gang who authored and executed the divestment and deprivation of the control of 26 companies employing 20,000 people in 2004 using public power described as the precursor to the coup of November 2017 that was orchestrated by the same gang against Mugabe after successfully prosecuting the coup against SMM and related entities.

TM: Thank you for the honest response and obviously when I watched the video, I could not make the link between Mutumwa Mawere and the looting.
Perhaps you can share evidence supporting the allegation of surrogacy and the corruption
therefore in, so that I can afford both president Mnangagwa and Mawere to give their own
account of the precise nature of the alleged link between public power and private benefit.
Unfortunately, the video’s content does not establish the causal link which is vital in determining any dispute in an Independent and impartial manner.
HC: I didn’t say Mutumwa was corrupt.
I said that there were public funds that were doled out which amounted to looting.
You are misinterpreting what I said.
The video has nothing to do with Mutumwa being corrupt, it was meant to illustrate how public funds were looted way before sanctions.

Hopewell denies what he said before and claims the video that he intentionally and constructively shared to demonstrate the origins of Mnangagwa’s corruption had nothing to with Mawere being party to the looting of public funds.

TM: Thank you for clarifying and I am intrigued by your response.
You have asserted as true and fact that Mawere was Mnangagwa front and this aspect is not
evident in the video, suggesting that evidence exists that the alleged fronting you are talking
about, is supported by concrete evidence which is required in any bona fide process, seeking to hold people accountable for their conduct or misconduct. I would be grateful if you can identify in precise terms what Mawere front for Mnangagwa.

Mr. Chin’ono on SABC repeating the narrative of corruption as the cause of the Zim crisis.

Advocate Jack Matiza who was incensed by Mr. Chin’ono’s utterances remarked asked: “How can he be held responsible and accountable for social media post that damage another person reputation? My take is Hopewell is also guilty of selective amnesia he is accusing Ramaphosa of when it comes to sanctions, by stating that Mutumwa Mawere was an front of ED without providing any proof to that. Our self acclaimed award winning journalist and human right defender…ought to know that he who alleges must prove, is he not using or abusing social media or public media platforms to make unfounded statements without allowing the accused an opportunity to air their side of the story is itself an abuse of that person’s basic human rights?
To which Mr. Mawere responded as follows: “What if there exists no shared understanding on what are the obligations and rights of citizenship? What Hopewell could be saying is that information that he may possess is true and fact unless proved otherwise because he holds a privileged position in society as a journalist. In this case, affinity politics would compel him to conclude that because I shared the same platform with the current President of Zimbabwe this reality confirms a generally corrupt relationship. You can imagine what the true import of state capture and the legal consequences arising for its existence.”
Advocate Matiza by stating as follows: “There is certainly need to actively contribute to development of such shared understanding and common standards.”
Mr. Mawere commended as follows: “If asked to explain why the conversation is intriguing, what would be your response?

Mr Chin’ono genuinely believes that CORRUPTION is the elephant in the room.

He hold the view that he occupies a special and exceptional position in relation to the affairs of Zimbabwe.

He has a view on the 1996 video.”

When asked by Mr. Mawere, what identified questions arise from the hypocrisy inherent in Mr. Chin’ono’s open attack against Mawere and when confronted by Mr. Manikai, he quickly denied what he had stated as true and fact, Advocate Matiza responded as follows:

1. Abuse of the profession of journalism by an acclaimed journalist who has no respect for the truth in his narratives.

2.How should one define a human rights defender especially having exposed Mr. Chin’ono’s embarrassing performance by first alleging that Mnangagwa was using Mawere as a front only to backtrack and deny his own bold assertions.

3.In the face of hypocrites masquerading as award-winning journalists, what should be the best response to deal with divisive characters who have captured the profession and are using it as a weapon to advance their ulterior motives?

4. Section 2 of the Constitution of Zimbabwe imposes a binding obligation on every person to ensure that the rule of law is promoted, protected and upheld and in this case, what should be done by ordinary citizens to ensure that people like Mr. Chin’ono are accountable for their conduct which is inimical to the rule of law?

5. Does a person like Mr. Chin’ono know that he is also subject to the constitution and possesses no title or authority to maliciously defame other people. How best can he be held accountable for his reckless and dangerous assertions he makes under the cover that he is a journalist par excellence?

6. Does his conduct based on Mpasiri’s excellent interrogation not fall within conduct that is inconsistent with the constitution of Zimbabwe?

Continue Reading


Please take notice of this announcement by ZIMRA



Continue Reading