Uncategorized
Manikai&Mnangagwa coup link exposed in a South African court case
Published
6 months agoon
By
Peter SmithIt started with Manikai, President Mnangagwa’s personal in relation to the Musengezi’s ZANU-PF, ascendancy challenge and the Mupasiri impeachment landmark case, who on 27 March 2017 lifted the lid on the untold Tsholotsho corruption story.
According to Manikai, who admitted that his relationship with Mnangagwa involved the ascendency project, a political fallout occurred between President Mnangagwa and Mr. Mawere that resulted in the use of public power to divest and deprive Mr. Mawere of the control and management of SMM and related companies.
Professor Mupasiri in his quest to get President Mnangagwa to give his own version of what he knows about the damning allegations made by Manikai, has discovered that seeking the President’s version using the agency of the highest court in Zimbabwe, the Constitutional Court, is an impossible task.
After failing to get a response to his letters from both President Mnangagwa and Manikai, he launched a court application on 17 December 2021 but failed to serve it on President Mnangagwa yet in this bizarre story, on 24 December 2021, he was served with an opposing affidavit duly signed under oath by President Mnangagwa.
When asked whether a matter can be set down without an affidavit of service confirming to court that an application has been served to all cited parties, one of the court registry officers said: “If the facts are as you state, then the court has no jurisdiction to hear a matter that is not properly before it and I am surprised that this matter was enrolled for hearing and determined without the all parties including the President complying with the rules of court.”
By choosing the agency of DMH to act on his behalf in matter in which Manikai admitted to have personal interests, Manikai effectively with the consent and knowledge of the President is acting as a lawyer in a matter in which he is conflicted.
With respect to the succession issue, it is unmistakable to an observer close to the Musengezi and Mupasiri challenges who remarked as follows:
“Not many people including Mr. Nqobani Sithole seem to understand the nexus between the two matters.
Manikai is a practicing attorney and as such is precluded and prohibited from acting in a cause in which he ought to be a witness as the facts of SMM confirm his direct involvement in his fight back strategy together with President Mnangagwa.
The Musengezi issue is also about succession and the methods used to realize this and the involvement of persons like Manikai in advising Mnangagwa that there would be no legal and constitutional consequences of the removing Mnangagwa having been instrumental in crafting the extrajudicial dethronement of Mawere with no court rising to defeat this coup precedent.
Can you imagine that a judge like Patel who was the Acting Attorney General on 6 September 2004 when a coup order or reconstruction order was issued in relation to SMM is presiding over a matter in which he knew and ought to have known of how the idea admitted by Manikai of issuing and prosecuting an order whose effect was to undermine the rule of law, would not ordinarily have the conscience to recuse himself from hearing the matter in which the constitutional validity is in contestation?
It is not surprising that Manikai is defending the President in the ascendancy dispute.
He ks tried and tested in defending the indefensible with the Law Society of Zimbabwe playing a cheerleader role.
If I was Mupasiri’s legal advisor, I would advice him to apply to join in the Musengezi dispute seeking the court to determine and declare whether Manikai can act for the President in his official and unofficial capacities on a matter in which Manikai has already admitted to have a personal interest in.
This would be an interesting angle to the Musengezi matter and help guide the lawless legal practice system that is an enabler of judicial capture.
To me the relationship between Manikai and Mbangagwa is at the core of both disputes.
I can understand now why they are so desperate to have Mawere sequestrated in SA so that this link is buried.
Manikai is not defending Zanu PF, but his personal friend and colleague whom his power rise assisted and crafted.
DMH is now a common factor in all litigations involving the President.
The ascendancy of the President was powered by the Recon Act, as SMM became their cash cow.”
I was also thinking that the matter of that 2million USD advanced by RBZ to AMG should be pursued as it is of national interest.
I
s Renews ort

You may like
Uncategorized
PRESIDENT RAMAPHOSA TO ADDRESS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE CONSTITUTION
Published
2 days agoon
Mar 21, 2023
President Cyril Ramaphosa will tomorrow , Wednesday, 22 March 2023, deliver the keynote address at the first day of the three-day National Conference on the Constitution which is titled Reflections And The Road Ahead.
The event will take place at the Gallagher Convention Centre in Midrand, Gauteng, under the theme “Reflections on the Constitution: Rule of law, accountability, social and economic justice”.
The conference gives the nation an opportunity to reflect and engage in dialogue on the past 25 years of the Constitution, nation building, gender equality, youth economic empowerment, service delivery and social stability, with the objective of charting a way forward that builds on the gains of democracy.
As a platform for deliberating on continuous, robust debate on the purpose and effectiveness of the Constitution, the National Conference on the Constitution intends to broaden the discourse on the Constitution and encourage members of the public to participate in the conversation on constitutionalism and the state of democracy in the country.
Some of the focus areas in the programme include:
• Transforming and building an independent and resilient judiciary;
• Transforming and growing the economy as a constitutional imperative;
• Progress on land reform: restitution and distribution;
• Governance and electoral reform;
• Effectiveness of constitutional and independent statutory bodies in strengthening
constitutional democracy.
The conference will be attended by prominent figures of South African society including academics, members of legislatures, constitutional and independent statutory bodies, mayors, political parties, youth, students, business leaders, religious leaders, representatives of the legal fraternity, traditional leaders, media and others.
The conference will be held as follows:
Date : 22-24 March 2023
Time : 08h30
Venue: Gallagher Convention Centre, Midrand, Gauteng
Uncategorized
COCA COLA V CHINAMASA – WAS IT EXTORTION OR A BRIBE
Published
3 days agoon
Mar 20, 2023Here are the facts:
THE COCA COLA COMPANY (TCCC) acquired THE ENTIRE ISSUED SHARE CAPITAL OF CADBURY SCHWEPPES PLC resulting in the control and management of the global Schweppes businesses into TCCC value chains including Schweppes Zimbabwe Limited (SZL), a company incorporated in terms of the laws of Zimbabwe.
Mr. Brian Musekiwa, a Zimbabwean-born professional based in Texas, USA, said: “I had no idea of the SZL matter and its intersection with the SMM Holdings Private Limited (SMM) affair until I joined the Justice Under Rule of Law’s (JUROL) corporate heritage and legal literacy campaign powered by the Banking on Africa’s Future (BOAF) of which I am a paid up member. I have followed the SZL saga with keen interest not because of the Zimbabwe angle but because TCCC is a global corporate icon and just the idea that this company was party to an extortion and corrupt deal involving the payment of $2.7 million to Chinamasa, Mnangagwa’s key 2017 coup ally, is chilling leading any person like me to want to know if there exists any causal link between the complicity of TCCC’s alleged corrupt practices and conduct in relation to the affairs of the SZL localization and upgrade program concluded with Africa Resources Limited (ARL), a private company incorporated in terms of the laws of the BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS (BVI) and wholly owned by Mr. Mutumwa Mawere, a Zimbabwean born South African naturalized citizen, who Mnangagwa and Chinamasa using Messrs. Edwin Manikai and Afaras Gwaradzimba as surrogates, and the extrajudicial and the unconscionable theft of the control and management of SZL and other juristic entities using an unprecedented draconian and barbaric law called the Reconstruction of State-Indebted Insolvent Companies Act that was authored by Mnangagwa to bridge him to state power.”
Mr. Cornwell Mutetwa, a Zimbabwean businesan said: “I naively thought that the reconstruction project was solely premised on the affairs of SMM as a company and not on the person of Mawere and his alleged interests in companies like SZL.
I am pleased that Mr. Mucha Mugore, a member of BOAF-JUROL, inspired by findings in his MBA dissertation research on how public power was abused in expropriating Mawere’s relationships with not only SMM but many separate and distinct juristic entities, provoked in a whatsapp group that the record of this sad chapter in the corporate history of Zimbabwe must be corrected preferably in form of a memoir written by Mawere.
I was encouraged and remain so that I have flins myself being part of this noble project that has enabled me to interface with Mr. Mawere who has generously downloaded critical information that hitherto has not been in the public domain. I had no idea that Coca Cola Holdings Netherlands (CCHN) was directly and indirectly involved in the affairs of SZL until I read this:

Having understood that it was the Zimbabwe Competition and Tariffs Commission (TCTC) was weaponized to have jurisdiction beyond its mandate to regulate competition issues to become relevant in prescribing localization matters, I began to understand that under the late Mugabe’s watch the governance system was already broken.
My memory was then provoked to appreciate why the former Minister of Indigenization, Hon Kasukuwere, had a hand in the SZL matter and used his public office to cause ZCTC to require as a condition for approving that the control and management of SZL be divested and deprived from TCCC using public power.
It is against this background that the extortion inherent in the extract below from a meeting between SZL’s then SA-based legal counsel, an employee of Coca Cola South Africa Pty Limited, a private company incorporated in terms of the laws of SA, can properly be understood:

On the advise of Gwaradzimba whose relationship with SMM was a consequence of a decree and an order issued by Chinamasa with no judicial involvement, CCSA according to Mr. Mokwena, in his capacity as the legal counsel of both SZL and CCSA, was advised by Gwaradzimba and accepted his advise to part with a bribery of $2.7 in million to cause Chinamasa to exercise public power to issue a notice removing SZL from the purported and unlawful and invalid control by Gwaradzimba using the order issued by Chinamasa in relation to SMM affairs only.
It is chilling that Chinamasa used public power to issue a notice dates 26 January 2006 and through his appointee was rewarded with a secret gift of $2.7 million to the prejudice of ARL and its sole shareholder, Mr. Mawere.”
Mr. Peter Makoni, an attorney and a member of BOAF-JUROL, said: “I have had the opportunity to read and understand the sequence of events leading to the confiscation of equipment acquired by ARL using the personal agency of Mr. Mawere as set out below:

Having concluded that Chinamasa was unjustly enriched to the tune of $2.7 million based on fraudulent representation that the $2.7 million that ARL, a company whose affairs fell outside the jurisdiction of Zimbabwe and, therefore Chinamasa and his surrogates, in exchange for a government gazette to divest and deprive ARL of the control and management of the upgrade equipment that was conveyed by Petter Trading Pty Limited as ARL’s agent, received pocket money to be used for ulterior motives in the amount of $2.7 million from CCSA.
It would please anyone interested in building a future of not only Zimbabwe but Africa that is characterized by the respect of the rule of law to take notice of the documents in the flipbook below:”
PRESIDENT RAMAPHOSA TO ADDRESS NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE CONSTITUTION
WHOSE MINERALS ARE THEY ANYWAY?
COCA COLA V CHINAMASA – WAS IT EXTORTION OR A BRIBE

Commission hears evidence from President Ramaphosa

National University of Technology in Zimbabwe (NUST) Lecturer, Dr. Kernan Mzelikahle Inducted into the Banking On Africa’s Future – 10 000 Points of Light

Watch Speech by the PRAZ CEO during Public Procurement Breakfast Meeting.
Trending
-
FB Live2 years ago
Commission hears evidence from President Ramaphosa
-
C2C Community2 years ago
National University of Technology in Zimbabwe (NUST) Lecturer, Dr. Kernan Mzelikahle Inducted into the Banking On Africa’s Future – 10 000 Points of Light
-
Business3 years ago
Watch Speech by the PRAZ CEO during Public Procurement Breakfast Meeting.
-
Legal Literacy2 years ago
State Capture in South Africa – Zuma versus the Judiciary – Where Do You Go When You Have a Dispute with the Courts/Judiciary?
-
Uncategorized3 months ago
BREAKING NEWS – PELE IS NO MORE MHSRIEP
-
Featured12 months ago
BOAF in collaboration with IniAfrica.com making waves
-
Uncategorized1 year ago
Knight Frank (Zimbabwe) exposed
-
Breaking News2 years ago
The Truth behind Solomon Chanengeta’s intimidation