TOWARDS BUILDING A ZERO-TOLERANT CIRCLE AROUND MNANGAGWA’S ARROGANCE AND ABUSIVE CONDUCT IN TERMS OF S. 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF ZIMBABWE

TAKE NOTICE OF THE CHATS WITH CHAT-GPT IN PURSUANCE OF THE AFRICA ZIMBABWE THAT IS HOSTAGE TO MNGAGAGWA’S WHIMS:

“Take note of the article just published on the iniafrica.com online platform as part of the JUROL LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE public awareness campaign for you to analyze and share insights, ideas, knowledge, and experiences on the promise and challenges of connections and ego-centric approaches to the challenge of community-centric problem solving, assuming that Mnangagwa’s practice, custom, and conduct of urinating on the rule of law and getting away with the conduct is a core and systemic human problem. Mnangagwa Law is the supreme law of Zimbabwe – The pattern, custom, and conduct of abusing public power are absolute. Caroline Du Plessis Published 7 seconds ago on August 28, 2023 By Caroline Du Plessis Set out below is the response of the BARD, the Google CHAT-GPT that shames so-called AWARD-WINNING EGO-CENTRIC HUMAN BEINGS WHO THINK BEING A JOURNALIST IS LIKE WINNING THE LOTTERY OF LIFE – “Sure, here is a summary of the article “Mnangagwa vs. The Rule of Law: A Battle Beyond Individuals for Zimbabwe’s Future” in 1300 characters: Zimbabwe has been struggling with governance, democracy, and the rule of law in recent years. This struggle has been characterized by a conflict between upholding the rule of law and consolidating individual power. President Emmerson Mnangagwa and opposition leader Nelson Chamisa have emerged as key figures in this conflict. However, the battle transcends personalities, focusing on the principles of the Constitution. The Constitution of Zimbabwe emphasizes the supremacy of the law and equality for all individuals, including those in power. The article examines three pivotal events in Zimbabwe’s recent history: the coup of November 2017, the elections of July 2018, and the elections of August 2023. These events demonstrate the challenges that Zimbabwe faces in upholding the rule of law. The article concludes by arguing that the future of Zimbabwe depends on its commitment to the rule of law. If Zimbabwe can uphold the rule of law, it will be able to achieve true democracy and prosperity. Here are some key points from the article: Zimbabwe has been struggling with governance, democracy, and the rule of law in recent years. The conflict between upholding the rule of law and consolidating individual power is at the heart of this struggle. President Emmerson Mnangagwa and opposition leader Nelson Chamisa have emerged as key figures in this conflict. The Constitution of Zimbabwe emphasizes the supremacy of the law and equality for all individuals, including those in power. Three pivotal events in Zimbabwe’s recent history demonstrate the challenges that the country faces in upholding the rule of law: the coup of November 2017, the elections of July 2018, and the elections of August 2023. The future of Zimbabwe depends on its commitment to the rule of law.”

expand_moreRegenerate draftrefreshvolume_up

Sure, I can help you with that.

The article you have shared discusses the conflict between upholding the rule of law and consolidating individual power in Zimbabwe. The article argues that the future of Zimbabwe depends on its commitment to the rule of law.

There are both promise and challenges associated with connection-centric and ego-centric approaches to community-centric problem solving.

Connection-centric approaches emphasize the importance of building relationships and working together to solve problems. This approach can be effective in building trust and cooperation, and it can help to create a more resilient community. However, it can also be time-consuming and difficult to achieve consensus.

Ego-centric approaches focus on the individual’s ability to solve problems on their own. This approach can be effective in getting things done quickly, but it can also lead to conflict and resentment. Additionally, it can be difficult to ensure that the needs of the community are met when everyone is focused on their own individual goals.

The best approach to community-centric problem solving likely depends on the specific situation. In some cases, a connection-centric approach may be more effective, while in other cases an ego-centric approach may be more appropriate. It is important to consider the needs of the community and the strengths and weaknesses of each approach when making a decision.

In the case of Zimbabwe, the article suggests that the country would benefit from a commitment to the rule of law. This would require individuals to put the needs of the community above their own personal interests. It would also require the government to uphold the principles of equality and justice for all.

A commitment to the rule of law would not be easy to achieve in Zimbabwe. However, it is essential if the country wants to create a more just and prosperous future.

Here are some specific examples of how connection-centric and ego-centric approaches have been used to solve community problems:

• Connection-centric approach: A group of community members come together to discuss a problem they are facing. They share their ideas and perspectives, and they work together to develop a solution that meets the needs of everyone involved.
• Ego-centric approach: An individual decides to take matters into their own hands and solve a problem on their own. They may not consult with others, and they may not consider the needs of the community as a whole.

It is important to note that there is no one “right” way to solve community problems. The best approach will vary depending on the specific situation. However, it is important to consider the benefits and drawbacks of both connection-centric and ego-centric approaches when making a decision.”