Zimbabwean Ghosts Haunting SA Courts? Dr. Shumba Reveals Shocking Connections in His Fight Against SMM’s Intervention

In a legal saga that seems straight out of a political thriller, Dr. Daniel Kuzozvirava Shumba, President of JUROL Leadership Institute – AI Africa, JLI-AI AFRICA, has unveiled a web of connections that he claims are haunting South African courts. The battleground? A controversial intervention judgment involving SMM Holdings Private Limited, a Zimbabwean entity, in the High Court of South Africa.

The Intricate Legal Battle Unveiled:

Dr. Shumba’s fight against the intervention judgment, rendered on December 21, 2023, takes center stage in what appears to be a complex legal entanglement. The shocking revelations he brings to light prompt us to question whether Zimbabwean ghosts are indeed casting shadows in South African courtrooms.

Lack of Jurisdiction: At the heart of Dr. Shumba’s challenge is the assertion that the court lacked jurisdiction to handle a dispute involving a foreign litigant, especially one with claims and rights under a law conflicting with South Africa’s Constitution.

Violation of International Law and Comity: The intervention by SMM Holdings, described as a “Zimbabwean creature of a reconstruction decree,” raises concerns about the violation of international law and principles of comity. Dr. Shumba argues that allowing intervention under an allegedly invalid law in South Africa compromises the integrity of the legal system.

Exceeding Statutory Powers: Dr. Shumba doesn’t stop there; he contends that the court not only lacked inherent jurisdiction but went further to exceed its statutory powers in granting intervention to a company under reconstruction, whose affairs, according to him, fall outside the ambit of the Companies Act.

Unlawful and Invalid Conduct: Allegations of unlawful and invalid conduct are leveled against the court, with Dr. Shumba maintaining that allowing the intervention is a direct violation of the Constitution, rendering the court’s actions both unlawful and invalid.

Shady Deals and Collateral Challenges: Adding a layer of complexity, Dr. Shumba points to a fraudulent US$2.7 million settlement deal and other transactions during the reconstruction period. He insists that the court failed to consider evidence of fraudulent activities, thereby jeopardizing the interests of South African individuals and entities.

Public Interest at Stake: Amidst these legal intricacies, Dr. Shumba underscores the public interest at stake. The urgency of the matter arises from the far-reaching consequences of allowing SMM to intervene, affecting fundamental rights, economic stability, and public trust in the legal system.

No State Capture Here: Dr. Shumba’s revelations challenge any notions of state capture, asserting that his fight is against the consistent and audacious violation of constitutional principles over the past 19 years, with South African courts allegedly being exploited with impunity.

South Africa First: The hashtag #SouthAfricaFirst becomes a rallying cry in Dr. Shumba’s quest to protect the rule of law and safeguard the Constitution. His dedication to upholding the principles that underpin South Africa’s legal system is evident, as he calls for a closer examination of the connections that seem to transcend borders.

In the coming days, the courtroom drama is set to unfold as Dr. Shumba’s legal challenge gains momentum. The question lingers: Are Zimbabwean ghosts truly haunting South African courts, or is this a battle against injustice and undue influence? The pursuit of truth and justice continues.