Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri boldly reminds Zimbabweans to grateful for liberating them from colonial BONDAGE.

Oppah Muchinguri-Kashiri sparks outrage for boldly reminding Zimbabweans to be grateful for liberating them from colonial BONDAGE.

Liberty is an unalienable right given common to all and as such it cannot be divested and deprived from a living person.

Unknown to many is that the liberation struggle was not about giving any rights but about asssertmg a self-evident truth that all human beings belong to one indivisible identity of creatures who possess the power of freewill and any human construction founded on dividing human beings by race or other property was fatally defective and, therefore, doomed to fail.

Mr. Mupasiri, Director of Public Policy at the Justice Under Rule of Law (JUROL) said: “After 42 years of independence, one can appreciate the pervasive illiteracy the is everywhere.

The idea that the liberation struggle was about creating a new apartheid-loke civilization in which the so-called liberators assumed a new human identity superior to others is well established entitlement strategy allowing for holders of this view to escape the obligations that is entrenched in s2(2) of the Zimbabwean constitution that nobody is above the law but subject to it irrespective of the role played in the civil rights struggle.

Zimbaabwe belongs to all who live in it.

What is crazy is that this message is contradicted by empirical evidence from the diaspora community which is expanding by the day involving people who cross the borders of Zimbabwe outwardly to land in distant shores with nothing but lift themselves from ground zero to something with no one who is rational having the right to claim their right or interest let alone suggest that they must be grateful to another human being of flesh for being their blessers.

One would have expected a Minister of Defence who took an oath to promote, defend and uphold the constitution to know that her oath must mean something and she has absolutely no right and capacity to insult the sovereignty vested in all the living human beings by the creator.

Her relationship with the government is humanly created and it was not because of her participation in a historical struggle but because of the exercise of the right to vote that is and should be unfettered.

The President’s relationship with the government is and should be in terms of the oath he took that of AGENT and PRINCIPAL and he serves at the pleasure of the very citizens that OPPAH is clearly denigrating.

When we speak of the RULE OF LAW, it is to assert the futility and bankruptcy of the idea that people can use history as a licence to loot simply on account of what they claim to have done in the past.

Now I understand the true import of the second amendment in a country like the USA, being the right to BEAR ARMS because this kind of toxic thinking provokes outrage when it is recklessly expressed to create the impression that history created some assertable rights.

Justice under Law is an idea that is founded on the doctrine of EQUALITY which is a fundamental tenet of the RULE of LAW.

Absent the RULE of LAW, the properties of the ANIMAL FARM substitute the certainty and accountability that are prerequisites for igniting the best in humanity.

Freedom to unleash the gifts we all have is a sine qua non for development.

It is regrettable that the mind sickness that infirmed OPPAH’s reckless abuse of social media to suggest that she must be treated as exceptional should have been nipped in the first second of independence life.”